[Ocfs2-users] ASM over OCFS2 vs. Standard locally managed tablespaces

[Karim Alkhayer]

Hello All,

 

Are there any benchmarks with respect to performance with respect to ASM
over OCFS2 vs. standard locally managed tablespaces?

In our environment, data files hosting tables/lobs are stored on a RAID6
disk array with 10K rpm disks, whilst indices are  stored on a different
RAID6 disk array with 15K rpm disks.

We're using oracle managed files for the rollback/undo and temporary
tablespaces. 

Would ASM over OCFS2 be smart enough to detect the fast LUNs? 

 

Appreciate your thoughts.

 

Best regards,

Karim

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20090207/b1547c34/attachment.html