[Ocfs2-users] ASM over OCFS2 vs. Standard locally managed tablespaces

[Sunil Mushran]

OTN has a forum for ASM. Please post this qs on that forum.

On Feb 7, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Karim Alkhayer <kkhayer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
>
>
> Are there any benchmarks with respect to performance with respect to  
> ASM over OCFS2 vs. standard locally managed tablespaces?
>
> In our environment, data files hosting tables/lobs are stored on a  
> RAID6 disk array with 10K rpm disks, whilst indices are  stored on a  
> different RAID6 disk array with 15K rpm disks.
>
> We’re using oracle managed files for the rollback/undo and temporary 
>  tablespaces.
>
> Would ASM over OCFS2 be smart enough to detect the fast LUNs?
>
>
>
> Appreciate your thoughts.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Karim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users