[Ocfs2-users] Hi

[Randy Ramsdell]

Sunil Mushran wrote:
> None of what you have written allows you to use our resources to
> spread your opinions as official recommendation.

I don't think he said that oracle doesn't recommend that solution.
What about your resources? Are ext3 and heartbeat your resources? I want
to hear Alexi's opinion as well as yours Sunil.

RCR



 

> Alexei_Roudnev wrote:
>> Yes, you distribute and support OCFSv2; but Oracle is another story,
>> and the
>> common recommendation
>> from many different Oracle engineers (not related to OCFSv2) is
>> _don't use
>> OCFS for RAC files /OCRFile and CSSFile/_. Which I fully agree - it
>> don't
>> have any benefits but a lot of headache. Using OCFSv2 for backups or
>> archive
>> logs is another story, for example.
>>
>> Oracle itself have not a SINGLE opinion (to be curious, I hear a strong
>> recommendation against OCFSv2 from oracle support, which I can not agree
>> with), so we can't treat your recommendations as official as well -
>> you are
>> interested in OCFSv2 while users are not (users are interested in
>> making our
>> data centers run smoothly). The only _official_ thing is _certification
>> matrix_.