[fedfs-utils] [PATCH 0/3] Proposing fedfs-utils 0.9.2

[David Disseldorp]

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:36:56 -0400
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com> wrote:

> > The shared libraries don't appear to be needed to satisfy missing symbols
> > for the plug-in library. My preference would be to completely remove the
> > $(LIB*) entries from libnfsjunct_la_LIBADD, rather than keep the
> > incorrect order.  
> 
> Would it be acceptable to make that change in 0.10-devel, and not in 0.9-stable?

Sure, I'm fine with that. The second patch:
[PATCH 2/2] build: fix gcc linker library argument placement
could be pulled in independent of the plug-in library change, or would
you prefer that I resend?

Cheers, David