[fedfs-utils] [PATCH 0/3] Proposing fedfs-utils 0.9.2

[Chuck Lever]

On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:24 AM, David Disseldorp <ddiss at suse.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:36:56 -0400
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>>> The shared libraries don't appear to be needed to satisfy missing symbols
>>> for the plug-in library. My preference would be to completely remove the
>>> $(LIB*) entries from libnfsjunct_la_LIBADD, rather than keep the
>>> incorrect order.  
>> 
>> Would it be acceptable to make that change in 0.10-devel, and not in 0.9-stable?
> 
> Sure, I'm fine with that. The second patch:
> [PATCH 2/2] build: fix gcc linker library argument placement
> could be pulled in independent of the plug-in library change, or would
> you prefer that I resend?

I've merged 2/2 into both 0.9.2 and 0.10-devel.  It will appear in 0.9.2 when it is published next week.

0.10-devel, which branched at 0.9.0, is still in my main private repo.  I'll push it to my public repo once 0.9.2 is out.  Nothing exciting there yet!

-- 
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com