[fedfs-utils] [PATCH 0/3] Proposing fedfs-utils 0.9.2

[Chuck Lever]

On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:49 PM, David Disseldorp <ddiss at suse.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:07:00 -0400
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> It looks to me like you do not need to re-order the libraries for the plug-ins directory.  I get the same successful result whether or not --as-needed is specified.  Is there a justification for changing the plug-in library?  Risks?
> 
> The shared libraries don't appear to be needed to satisfy missing symbols
> for the plug-in library. My preference would be to completely remove the
> $(LIB*) entries from libnfsjunct_la_LIBADD, rather than keep the
> incorrect order.

Would it be acceptable to make that change in 0.10-devel, and not in 0.9-stable?

-- 
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com