[fedfs-utils] [PATCH 0/3] Proposing fedfs-utils 0.9.2

David Disseldorp ddiss at suse.de
Tue Jun 25 09:49:03 PDT 2013


On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:07:00 -0400
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com> wrote:

> It looks to me like you do not need to re-order the libraries for the plug-ins directory.  I get the same successful result whether or not --as-needed is specified.  Is there a justification for changing the plug-in library?  Risks?

The shared libraries don't appear to be needed to satisfy missing symbols
for the plug-in library. My preference would be to completely remove the
$(LIB*) entries from libnfsjunct_la_LIBADD, rather than keep the
incorrect order.

Cheers, David



More information about the fedfs-utils-devel mailing list