[Ocfs2-users] ASM over OCFS2 vs. Standard locally managed tablespaces

[Schmitter, Martin]

Hi Karim,

this sounds sportive.

I don’t know why you have concerns about networking with your standby. But I really suggest waive OCFS2. Believe me, you will run into lot of trouble. And this sounds to me, like a very important system. OCFS2 makes the solution more complex and more fragile.

Please do not misunderstand this. OCFS2 is a good file system. But OCFS2 in conjunction with CLUSTERWARE/CRS will be very tricky. If there is no way, make sure that your timings will work perfect! Otherwise you will have a tumbler.

Networking should not be your problem. A good switch and some truncs and may be some bonding und you will be save.

Good Luck

Martin Schmitter


--


OPITZ CONSULTING Gummersbach GmbH
Martin Schmitter - Fachinformatiker
Kirchstr. 6 - 51647 Gummersbach
http://www.opitz-consulting.de
Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Opitz, Martin Bertelsmeier
HRB-Nr. 39163 Amtsgericht Köln

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20090209/399b5b21/attachment-0001.html