[Ocfs2-tools-devel] ocfs2 tools

[Gang He]

>>> 
> On 03/02/2016 02:44 PM, Gang He wrote:
>> More comments, it looks that ocfs2 mainly contributions are from HW, Oracle 
> and SUSE.
>> So,  if a patch is reviewed by at least one side, which should be considered 
> as review pass.
>> then, I and Eric can pick up the patch to push into repo.
>> Does this make sense for us?
> I agree, just advise wait some while to merge the reviewed patch in case
> anybody else has different opinions.
Yes, if all give a reviewed-by, we can push the patch immediately.
If just one or two give a reviewed-by, we can wait for one or two day in case there is any different comments.

Thanks
Gang

> 
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Gang
>> 
>> 
>>>>>
>>> Agree. I'll help resend patches from my team.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>> On 2016/3/2 13:37, Gang He wrote:
>>>> Hello Mark, Joseph, Junxiao and All,
>>>>
>>>> It looks we missed some patches.
>>>> I just suggest that patch owners send the patches to the mail list again,
>>>> then we can review them, I and Eric can help to push the reviewed patches 
>>> into Mark's repo.
>>>> I think the main efforts need us to be involved into reviewing. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Gang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:50:20AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Gang,
>>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>>> How's the plan to pick up those missed patches?
>>>>>
>>>>> They need review on the mailing list. I've barely got time for kernel review
>>>>> these days so I was hoping some of you all could handle some of that. As far
>>>>> as getting it into the actual repository, I can add committers to the
>>>>> project as we need them.
>>>>>
>>>>> But regardless, the patches have to be reviewed, even if the person
>>>>> reviewing is the one eventually committing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 	--Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mark Fasheh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>