[Ocfs2-tools-devel] ocfs2 tools

Junxiao Bi junxiao.bi at oracle.com
Tue Mar 1 23:28:25 PST 2016


On 03/02/2016 02:44 PM, Gang He wrote:
> More comments, it looks that ocfs2 mainly contributions are from HW, Oracle and SUSE.
> So,  if a patch is reviewed by at least one side, which should be considered as review pass.
> then, I and Eric can pick up the patch to push into repo.
> Does this make sense for us?
I agree, just advise wait some while to merge the reviewed patch in case
anybody else has different opinions.

Thanks,
Junxiao.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Gang
> 
> 
>>>>
>> Agree. I'll help resend patches from my team.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joseph
>>
>> On 2016/3/2 13:37, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello Mark, Joseph, Junxiao and All,
>>>
>>> It looks we missed some patches.
>>> I just suggest that patch owners send the patches to the mail list again,
>>> then we can review them, I and Eric can help to push the reviewed patches 
>> into Mark's repo.
>>> I think the main efforts need us to be involved into reviewing. 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Gang
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:50:20AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>>> Hi Gang,
>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>> How's the plan to pick up those missed patches?
>>>>
>>>> They need review on the mailing list. I've barely got time for kernel review
>>>> these days so I was hoping some of you all could handle some of that. As far
>>>> as getting it into the actual repository, I can add committers to the
>>>> project as we need them.
>>>>
>>>> But regardless, the patches have to be reviewed, even if the person
>>>> reviewing is the one eventually committing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 	--Mark
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Fasheh
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> 




More information about the Ocfs2-tools-devel mailing list