[Ocfs2-tools-devel] Why not link libdlm_lt directly ?

[Coly Li]

Joel Becker Wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:19:43AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> I do not catch up with you yet. Could you please explain a little bit more why this is a redhat-lsb issue, and why
>> copying o2cb.init into vendor/common/ is helpful to the solution ?
> 
> 	redhat-lsb is not the issue with loading libdlm.so.  redhat-lsb
> is just the cause of ocfs2-tools pulling in 63MB of dependencies on
> Fedora.  ocfs2-tools uses the lsb init script functions.  On Fedora,
> those are in redhat-lsb, and redhat-lsb depends on the world.  Creating
> an init script that is distro-neutral but doesn't depend on the lsb
> package would solve that problem.
> 
I see. I will post a patch for this o2cb.init fix :-)
Thanks for the explaining.

-- 
Coly Li
SuSE Labs