[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel
Eric Ren
zren at suse.com
Mon Nov 6 21:30:46 PST 2017
Hi,
On 11/07/2017 10:43 AM, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2017/11/7 10:33, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are
>> overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.
>>
>> Pattern Failed Passed Skipped Total
>> DiscontigBgMultiNode 0 4 0 4
>> DiscontigBgSingleNode 0 5 0 5
>> MultipleNodes 0 9 1 10
>> SingleNode 0 18 1 19
> 18 SingleNode cases were failed. Is that normal?
It's 18 passed. Sorry, the format is little messy, please see the
attachment.
>
>> Notes:
>> - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time;
>> - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture.
>>
> I wonder why case - 'lvb_torture' is skipped on purpose?
We are using fsdlm, unfortunately this test case uses some user space
API that fsdlm plugin doesn't implement :)
Thanks,
Eric
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list