[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel

Eric Ren zren at suse.com
Mon Nov 6 21:30:46 PST 2017


Hi,

On 11/07/2017 10:43 AM, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2017/11/7 10:33, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are
>> overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.
>>
>> Pattern				Failed	Passed	Skipped	Total
>> DiscontigBgMultiNode 		0 	4 	0 	4
>> DiscontigBgSingleNode 		0 	5 	0 	5
>> MultipleNodes 			0 	9 	1 	10
>> SingleNode 			0 	18 	1 	19
> 18 SingleNode cases were failed. Is that normal?

It's 18 passed. Sorry, the format is little messy, please see the 
attachment.

>
>> Notes:
>> - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time;
>> - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture.
>>
> I wonder why case - 'lvb_torture' is skipped on purpose?
We are using fsdlm, unfortunately this test case uses some user space 
API that fsdlm plugin doesn't implement :)

Thanks,
Eric



More information about the Ocfs2-devel mailing list