[DTrace-devel] [PATCH 2/5] test: Remove xfail marker from tst.keysort.d

Eugene Loh eugene.loh at oracle.com
Thu Sep 8 00:03:47 UTC 2022


On 9/7/22 11:34, Kris Van Hees wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:22:57AM -0400, Eugene Loh via DTrace-devel wrote:
>> r-b Eugene
>> But shouldn't this be squashed into the (preceding) patch that provides
>> setopt()?
>> Specifically, that would give the setopt() patch an accompanying test.
> Yes, but the keysort test is too specific to one set of options whereas the
> setopt() implementation is really the core support.  Various options may need
> additional patches to implement them properly, on top of setopt.

Well, and it sounds like you're reordering the patches.  So, I'll hold 
off on my R-b until the reordered patches have been posted.

>> On 9/6/22 21:36, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
>>> With setopt() support, this test should work.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees at oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>    test/unittest/aggs/tst.keysort.d | 1 -
>>>    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/test/unittest/aggs/tst.keysort.d b/test/unittest/aggs/tst.keysort.d
>>> index ef01a0a3..31b95088 100644
>>> --- a/test/unittest/aggs/tst.keysort.d
>>> +++ b/test/unittest/aggs/tst.keysort.d
>>> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
>>>     */
>>>    /* @@nosort */
>>> -/* @@xfail: need setopt() support */
>>>    #pragma D option quiet
>> _______________________________________________
>> DTrace-devel mailing list
>> DTrace-devel at oss.oracle.com
>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/dtrace-devel



More information about the DTrace-devel mailing list