[rds-devel] [PATCH 03/21] RDS: Congestion-handling code
Or Gerlitz
ogerlitz at voltaire.com
Sat Jan 31 23:05:54 PST 2009
Andy Grover wrote:
>> So I wonder if this has been changed. Are you seeing RDS landing in the
>> mainline kernel with IB/iWARP being in separate transports?
> Getting RDS in mainline is independent of the development plan above.
> There is no reason to hold back from getting in mainline. It will
> immediately solve some issues (dynamic PF no longer needed) and it will
> bring RDS potentially more users, reviewers, and contributors. While RDS
> should mostly work and the code submitted should look nice, we should
> not wait until everything is perfect before submitting -- we should
> submit early, and then develop against mainline.
>
> Once RDS is in mainline in *any* form, then the process for updates is
> straightforward. So I'm not too worried about the specific features in
> the version of RDS that gets in initially.
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the detailed response which well clarified the current status
and how things might look like in the future. Sure, as you say, when RDS
goes into mainline, there --is-- process and the process --is--
straightforward (where in the current settings of being under ofed, both
hardly {actually neither really} exist), so I am with you on this
message of lets get there and then see what works better.
Or.
More information about the rds-devel
mailing list