[rds-devel] IB/iWARP code separation

[Or Gerlitz]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Steve Wise <swise at opengridcomputing.com> wrote:

>> Let me see that I am with you: if the completion only indicates that
>> the operation has been accepted for processing, then what can serve
>> the rdma initiator as an indication that they can reclaim the buffer?

> Completion of any WR means the associated buffers can be reclaimed.

So Rick's thought about the impossibility to reclaim the buffer at the
side initiating the rdma following the completion was wrong, I see.
What about the other claim saying that errors occurring on the remote
side of rdma op (e.g invalid remote stag) would not be reported
through the rdma completion status, is this correct? and if it does,
how are these errors delivered?

Or.