[Ocfs2-users] 答复: [Ocfs2-devel] Patch request reviews, for node reconnecting with other nodes whose node number is little than local, thanks a lot.
Srinivas Eeda
srinivas.eeda at oracle.com
Fri May 10 07:54:00 PDT 2013
On 05/09/2013 11:59 PM, Guozhonghua wrote:
>
> Thank you, but I have some questions about it.
>
> The IP address of network used by o2net is different with that used by
> o2hb, such as the o2net use 192.168.0.7, but the storage network is
> 192.168.10.7.
>
> So the tcp of o2net disconnected while the o2hb is still living
> writing heartbeat on the iSCSI LUNS.
>
> Another condition may be that it is the "deadline" io scheduler used,
> but the TCP message may use CFS, is it may cause o2hb is OK, but the
> o2net sometimes lose packets?
>
> There is one scenario as below:
>
> The Node 2013-SRV09(num 2) long time without messages from ZHJD-VM6
> (num 6), so it disconnects the TCP with ZHJD-VM6 (num 6).
>
> At the same time, the node ZHJD-VM6 detected TCP disconnection with
> 2013-SRV09, but ZHJD-VM6 does not reconnect 2013-SRV09, and so the
> ZHJD-VM6 is hanged.
>
> At the same time the o2hb is still OK, they did not evict each other,
> and there are other six nodes in the ocfs2 cluster is still accessing
> the storage.
>
> The two node is hangs up does not communicate with echo other but they
> can still access the storage disk, and the issue continued more than
> about 1 hour, we reboot all the nodes in the cluster to solve the issue.
>
You don't need to reboot all nodes. Just rebooting one node of the
broken connection should resolve the hang.
Sunil has written the following scripts that will help you list which
nodes lost connection. You can find that from reviewing messages files
as well, but scripts are more convenient.
https://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/debug/scripts/hb/
This piece of network code needs a little rework. First we need to know
what is causing nodes to loose connection. Can you please run tcpdump on
all nodes and forward me the logs when the problem happens again.
tcpdump -Z root -i $DEVICE -C 50 -W 10 -s 2500 -Sw /tmp/`hostname
-s`_tcpdump.log -ttt 'port 7777' &
logs gets recycled, so you may have to stop the scripts immediately
after the problem.
>
> The syslog digested of 2013-SRV09 is as below:
>
> May 4 09:08:34 2013-SRV09 kernel: [310434.984511] o2net: No longer
> connected to node ZHJD-VM6 (num 6) at 185.200.1.17:7100
>
> May 4 09:08:34 2013-SRV09 kernel: [310434.984558]
> (libvirtd,3314,7):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:395 ERROR: Error
> -112 when sending message 504 (key 0x77c0b1d1) to node 6
>
> ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
>
> May 4 09:08:34 2013-SRV09 kernel: [310434.984653]
> (kvm,58972,29):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:395 ERROR: Error -112
> when sending message 504 (key 0x77c0b1d1) to node 6
>
> May 4 09:08:34 2013-SRV09 kernel: [310434.984663] o2dlm: Waiting on
> the death of node 6 in domain AE16636E1B83497A88D6A50178172ECA
>
> ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
>
> May 4 09:08:39 2013-SRV09 kernel: [310440.077475]
> (libvirtd,3314,2):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:395 ERROR: Error
> -107 when sending message 504 (key 0x77c0b1d1) to node 6
>
> ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
>
> May 4 10:11:05 2013-SRV09 kernel: [314178.586741]
> (kvm,58484,10):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:395 ERROR: Error -107
> when sending message 504 (key 0x77c0b1d1) to node 6
>
> May 4 10:11:05 2013-SRV09 kernel: [314178.586768] o2dlm: Waiting on
> the death of node 6 in domain AE16636E1B83497A88D6A50178172ECA
>
> May 4 10:11:05 2013-SRV09 kernel: [314178.638607]
> (kvm,58972,11):dlm_send_remote_convert_request:395 ERROR: Error -107
> when sending message 504 (key 0x77c0b1d1) to node 6
>
> May 4 10:11:05 2013-SRV09 kernel: [314178.638622] o2dlm: Waiting on
> the death of node 6 in domain AE16636E1B83497A88D6A50178172ECA
>
> The syslog on node ZHJD-VM6:
>
> May 4 09:09:19 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.574247] o2net: Connection to
> node 2013-SRV09 (num 2) at 185.200.1.14:7100 shutdown, state 8
>
> May 4 09:09:19 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.574317] o2net: No longer
> connected to node 2013-SRV09 (num 2) at 185.200.1.14:7100
>
> May 4 09:09:19 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.574371]
> (dlm_thread,4818,7):dlm_send_proxy_ast_msg:484 ERROR:
> AE16636E1B83497A88D6A50178172ECA: res M000000000000000d4a010600000000,
> error -112 send AST to node 2
>
> May 4 09:09:19 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.574388]
> (dlm_thread,4818,7):dlm_flush_asts:553 ERROR: status = -112
>
> May 4 09:09:20 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.605818]
> (dlm_thread,4818,4):dlm_send_proxy_ast_msg:484 ERROR:
> AE16636E1B83497A88D6A50178172ECA: res M00000000000000246c010400000000,
> error -107 send AST to node 2
>
> May 4 09:09:20 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [348569.605839]
> (dlm_thread,4818,4):dlm_flush_asts:553 ERROR: status = -107
>
> ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
>
> May 4 10:12:30 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [352357.836983] o2net: No connection
> established with node 2 after 30.0 seconds, giving up.
>
> May 4 10:13:00 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [352387.902370] o2net: No connection
> established with node 2 after 30.0 seconds, giving up.
>
> If the condition satisfied, is there some ways to avoid the hangs issues?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> *发件人:*Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mushran at gmail.com]
> *发送时间:*2013年5月10日1:02
> *收件人:*guozhonghua 02084
> *抄送:*ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com; ocfs2-devel-request at oss.oracle.com;
> changlimin 00148
> *主题:*Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Patch request reviews, for node reconnecting
> with other nodes whose node number is little than local, thanks a lot.
>
> A better fix is to _not_ disconnect on o2net timeout once a connection
> has been
> cleanly established. Only disconnect on o2hb timeout.
>
> The reconnects are a problem as we could lose packets and not be aware
> of it
> leading to o2dlm hangs.
>
> IOW, this patch looks to be papering over one specific problem and
> does not fix the
> underlying issue.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Guozhonghua <guozhonghua at h3c.com
> <mailto:guozhonghua at h3c.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone,
>
> I had have a test with eight nodes and find one issue.
>
>
> The Linux kernel version is 3.2.40.
>
> As I migrate processes from one node to another, those processes is
> open the files on the OCFS2 storage. Sometime one node shutdown TCP
> connection with that node whose node number is larger because long
> time without any message from it.
>
> As the TCP connection shutdown, the node whose number larger did not
> restart connection to the node, whose number is little and shutdown
> the TCP connection.
>
> So I review the code of the cluster and find it may be a bug.
>
> I changed it and have a test.
>
> Is there anybody having time to view and make sure that those changes
> is correct?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> The diff file is as below, of the file is /cluster/tcp.c:
>
> root at gzh-dev:/home/dev/test_replace/ocfs2_ko# diff -pu
> ocfs2-ko-3.2-compare/cluster/tcp.c ocfs2-ko-3.2/cluster/tcp.c
>
> --- ocfs2-ko-3.2-compare/cluster/tcp.c 2012-10-29 19:33:19.534200000
> +0800
>
> +++ ocfs2-ko-3.2/cluster/tcp.c 2013-05-08 09:33:16.386277310 +0800
>
> @@ -1699,6 +1698,10 @@ static void o2net_start_connect(struct w
>
> if (ret == -EINPROGRESS)
>
> ret = 0;
>
> + /** Reset the timeout with 0 to avoid connection again */
>
> + if (ret == 0) {
>
> + atomic_set(&nn->nn_timeout, 0);
>
> + }
>
> out:
>
> if (ret) {
>
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "o2net: Connect attempt to " SC_NODEF_FMT
>
> @@ -1725,6 +1728,11 @@ static void o2net_connect_expired(struct
>
> spin_lock(&nn->nn_lock);
>
> if (!nn->nn_sc_valid) {
>
> + /** trigger reconnect with other nodes whose node number is little
> than local
>
> + * while they are still able to access the storage
>
> + */
>
> + atomic_set(&nn->nn_timeout, 1);
>
> +
>
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "o2net: No connection established with "
>
> "node %u after %u.%u seconds, giving up.\n",
>
> o2net_num_from_nn(nn),
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面
> 地址中列出
> 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄
> 露、复制、
> 或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件
> 人并删除本
> 邮件！
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
> H3C, which is
> intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
> Any use of the
> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited
> to, total or partial
> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
> intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender
> by phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20130510/552e7b99/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Ocfs2-users
mailing list