[Ocfs2-users] Unable to mount cluster on CentOS and Ubunut at the same time

[David Murphy]

We are trying  to port our current Ubuntu based OCFS2 cluster to  CentOS 5.2
(RHEL)  but  Ubuntu is using DLM v. 1.3.9 not 1.4.1   but its tools are on
1.4.1. So I am getting  a  Network version mismatch. Is there any way  to
upgrade the  DLM  , I have tried updating the kernels. IF I upgrade from
Ubuntu 8.04 to 9.04. It  says the  DLM version is  1.50 not 1.41. Which
further confuses me. Basically I need to have  a temporary mixed environment
to transition nodes over to  CentOS.

Is the DLM a  kernel module like I assume it is or something the
ocfs2-tools should be upgrading when those are on 1.41 + ?

David
-----Original Message-----
From: ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Sunil Mushran
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:23 PM
To: David Murphy
Cc: ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Unable to mount cluster on CentOS and Ubunut at
the same time

The production release of ocfs2 (1.2, 1.4, and the upcoming 1.6) is only
available for (rh)el and sles. No other distributions.

David Murphy wrote:
>
> I think I found the core issue.
>
> The DLM on Centos is running 1.4.1, but on Ubuntu its 1.3.3, I can't 
> seem to find any packages for debian or Ubuntu that upgrade the kernel 
> modules to 1.4 series. Does anyone know how I can do this?
>
> David
>
> *From:* ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] *On Behalf Of *David 
> Murphy
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:46 AM
> *To:* ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> *Subject:* [Ocfs2-users] Unable to mount cluster on CentOS and Ubunut 
> at the same time
>
> Web2 is out Ubuntu Node and Web1 is a new CentOS 5.3 Node I put
> 1.4.1-1 on CentOS to match the one on the Ubuntu nodes. Also I copied 
> the o2cb configs from the Ubuntu node to the CentOS one. O2CB starts 
> just fine , but I get these errors when I try to start the ocfs2 
> service or mount the partition:
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node deploy (num 5) at
> 192.168.102.12:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node deploy (num 5) at
> 192.168.102.12:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> Does anyone have any ideas what's going on? Full Dmesg, rpm, dpkg 
> output is below:
>
> OCFS2 Node Manager 1.4.1 Wed Jan 21 11:39:16 PST 2009 (build
> 304d9ff0c301f79f846e3cc423c30674)
>
> OCFS2 DLM 1.4.1 Wed Jan 21 11:39:16 PST 2009 (build
> 96988c7961cf38309cc33396bb27b400)
>
> OCFS2 DLMFS 1.4.1 Wed Jan 21 11:39:16 PST 2009 (build
> 96988c7961cf38309cc33396bb27b400)
>
> OCFS2 User DLM kernel interface loaded
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node web2 (num 2) at
> 192.168.102.41:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node web3 (num 3) at
> 192.168.102.42:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node web3 (num 3) at
> 192.168.102.42:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node app1 (num 6) at
> 192.168.102.10:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node app1 (num 6) at
> 192.168.102.10:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node rgapp1 (num 4) at
> 192.168.102.11:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node rgapp1 (num 4) at
> 192.168.102.11:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node deploy (num 5) at
> 192.168.102.12:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> (6203,0):o2net_check_handshake:1205 node deploy (num 5) at
> 192.168.102.12:7777 advertised net protocol version 8 but 11 is 
> required, disconnecting
>
> OCFS2 1.4.1 Wed Jan 21 11:39:13 PST 2009 (build
> a1974724e90d3f07ae88531f6a9547a9)
>
> (6240,0):dlm_request_join:1033 ERROR: status = -107
>
> (6240,0):dlm_try_to_join_domain:1207 ERROR: status = -107
>
> (6240,0):dlm_join_domain:1485 ERROR: status = -107
>
> (6240,0):dlm_register_domain:1732 ERROR: status = -107
>
> (6240,0):ocfs2_dlm_init:2662 ERROR: status = -107
>
> (6240,0):ocfs2_mount_volume:1251 ERROR: status = -107
>
> ocfs2: Unmounting device (8,129) on (node 1)
>
> [root at WEB1 /opt/build-scripts/CoreUtils/ocfs_rpms]# rpm -qa | grep 
> ocfs
>
> ocfs2-tools-1.4.1-1.el5
>
> ocfs2-2.6.18-128.el5-1.4.1-1.el5
>
> [root at WEB1 /opt/build-scripts/CoreUtils/ocfs_rpms]# ssh web2 "dpkg -l
> | grep ocfs"
>
> ii ocfs2-tools 1.4.1-1 tools for managing OCFS2 cluster filesystems
>
> [root at WEB1 /opt/build-scripts/CoreUtils/ocfs_rpms]#
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.24/2449 - Release Date: 
> 10/20/09 18:42:00
>
>   
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.24/2449 - Release Date: 10/20/09 18:42:00