[Ocfs2-users] Recommended block size for a mail environment

Luis Freitas lfreitas34 at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 22 07:35:02 PDT 2008


   Funny, I could not find a option to specify the number of inodes or the inodes/bytes ratio on mkfs.ocfs2?

Regards,
Luis


--- On Tue, 7/22/08, jab at ufba.br <jab at ufba.br> wrote:
From: jab at ufba.br <jab at ufba.br>
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Recommended block size for a mail environment
To: ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 9:22 AM

Hello all,

I have a mail environment, with a situation seemed with a previous  
mail "Different size with du and ls". My environment is:

Debian Etch 4.0
Postfix 2.3.8-2
ocfs2-tools 1.2.1-1.3
kernel 2.6.18-4-amd64

My "df -h" shows me the follow:

df -Th
/dev/sdb1    ocfs2    1,0T  894G  131G  88% /mails

df -Thi
File Syst.   Type      Inodes   IUsed IFree IUse% Mount on
/dev/sdb1    ocfs2       16M     14M    2,1M   88% /mails

but when I do a "du -sh . /mails" it shows me 480GB, so much
different  
from 849G. The OCFS2 block size is 4K. I made a script to average the  
medium mail size, and it's the follow:

0k to 1k - 8%
0k to 2k - 13%
0k to 3k - 22%
0k to 4k - 35%
4.1k to 6k - 15%
6.1 to 8k - 10%
8.1k to 10k - 9%
10.1k to 12k - 7%
rest - 24%

My debug.ocfs2 doesn't has the "-R" option:

# debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdb1
debugfs.ocfs2: invalid option -- R
debugfs.ocfs2 1.2.1


My doubts are:

4k is a good block size for this situation?
How to avoid waste space as now (~50%)?
If I choose to use 2k, will the available Inodes double (16M to 32M)?

Thanks a lot!

Jeronimo

----------------------------------------------------------------
Universidade Federal da Bahia - http://www.portal.ufba.br



_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20080722/08a46aac/attachment.html 


More information about the Ocfs2-users mailing list