[Ocfs2-users] new server and version ocfs2

[Sunil Mushran]

Actually, the mount will fail. The clusterstack detects mismatches
during the handshake.

The 1.3.9 tools corresponds with the file system that comes with
the kernel. It was the best release at that time. However, software
development is a constant process. We are adding new features
and fixing bugs all the time.

1.3 and 1.5 are the version numbers we reserve for the mainline
tree. 1.2 and 1.4 are reserved for the enterprise trees.

As far as we are concerned, they are all stable. However, as we are
adding new features in the mainline tree, you will run into issues.
That is, despite our best efforts to test, test and test.

If you are looking for more stability, use an enterprise distro.

Sunil

Wessel wrote:
> Make sure to remember that it is vital to have matching versions of OCFS2
> running on all your nodes. Mixing 1.2 with 1.3 and/or 1.4 can lead to
> unexpected behaviour at best.
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces at oss.oracle.com] Namens Aimar Marco
> Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2008 18:29
> Aan: ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> Onderwerp: [Ocfs2-users] new server and version ocfs2
>
> Hello,
> I've buy a new server and I will install DRBD+OCFS2.
> The SUSE 10.3 have a ocfs2-tools-1.2.6-18 instead the SUSE 11.0 have a
> ocfs2 1.3.9.
>
> 1.3 it's unstable or stable?It work better than 1.2?
> Or it is better to use the 1.4?
>
> Thank you and excuse for my english
>
>