[Ocfs2-users] ocfs Vs ocfs2

[Luis Freitas]

Hi,
   
       It seems that you inverted the times on the chart. 
   
  Regards,
  Luis

GOKHAN <agig2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
          Hi everbody this is my first post,
  I have two test server .(Both of them is idle)
  db1 : RHEL4 OCFS2
  db2 : RHEL3 OCFS
   
  I test the IO both of them
  The result is below.
   
                       db1(Time Spend)  db2(Time Spend)  OS Test Command    dd (1GB) (Yazma)  0m0.796s  0m18.420s  time dd if=/dev/zero of=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000    dd (1GB) (Okuma)  0m0.241s  8m16.406s  time dd of=/dev/zero if=./sill.t bs=1M count=1000    cp (1GB)  0m0.986s  7m32.452s  time cp sill.t sill2.t
   
  Why db1 is too slow than db2 ?
  Anybody have idea ?
   
  My production database is oracle 9205 on  RHEL3 and OCFS 
  I test the 9208 on RHEL4 and OCFS2 .
  I will try to decide to upgrade or not...
   
  Thx..
   
   


  
---------------------------------
  Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users._______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20070116/beac5eb0/attachment.html