[Ocfs2-users] Performance of OCFS2 compared to raw device
Antonio Luis Pereya Miranda
apermir at gmail.com
Wed Mar 1 04:26:15 CST 2006
Im not sure if this is the proper forum for these question.Sorry in advance.
Im facing the same problem because OCFS2 is not certified by Oracle yet.
Any Idea about when will be OCFS2 certified ... days , weeks, months ?
Thanks
Antonio
On 2/28/06, Sunil Mushran <Sunil.Mushran at oracle.com> wrote:
> In all internal tests, we have seen no noticeable diff in
> performance between the two.
>
> Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
> > Is there any difference in performance?
> >
> > We have now a stable cluster with OCFS2, that's delivering excellent
> > performance.
> >
> > But there are plans being made (not by me) to change _everything_ to raw
> > device because OCFS2 is not certified by Oracle yet.
> >
> > I am strongly against that and I'm trying to gather arguments to support my
> > case.
> >
> > The storage is Dell/EMC CX300 with fibre channel disks 15k rpm.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ocfs2-users mailing list
> > Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> Ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
>
--
Un Saludo
More information about the Ocfs2-users
mailing list