[Ocfs2-users] Performance of OCFS2 compared to raw device

Tue Feb 28 04:23:03 CST 2006

Is there any difference in performance?

We have now a stable cluster with OCFS2, that's delivering excellent 
performance.

But there are plans being made (not by me) to change _everything_ to raw 
device because OCFS2 is not certified by Oracle yet.

I am strongly against that and I'm trying to gather arguments to support my 
case.

The storage is Dell/EMC CX300 with fibre channel disks 15k rpm.

Thank you.