[Ocfs2-users] FC3

[Manish Singh]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:52:47PM +1100, Han Xie wrote:
> Hi Manish,
> 
> If load_ocfs2 is not used in current code, is there a replacement for it please?

Current as in what's in subversion. The last tarball released (which you
are using) needs this.

If you want to mess with the code in subversion, there are READMEs there
with some basic documentation.

-Manish

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manish Singh [mailto:manish.singh at oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2005 10:40 AM
> To: Han Xie
> Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users at oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] FC3
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 03:06:56PM +1100, Han Xie wrote:
> > Then everything is fine.  My Oracle has been running for half a day now, seems OK.  But I admit I will not be brave enough to try this on my production database unless someone in Oracle, like you, tell me it is OK.  Is this a FC3 issue or ocfs2 issue?  What do you think?
> 
> That's fine. In our source repository we've addressed this already:
> 
> http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-commits/2004-September/000804.html
>  
> > Another minor thing.  On my SUSE 9, and RedHat AS 3, and FC3, I have to hardcode MODULE in load_ocfs2 like this.
> > # If you must hardcode an absolute module path for testing, do it HERE.
> > # MODULE=/path/to/test/module/ocfsX.o
> > MODULE=/lib/modules/2.6.9-1.667/kernel/fs/ocfs2.ko
> > 
> > Without the above hardcode, it always failed with a FATAL error on insmod.
> 
> Current code doesn't use load_ocfs2 anymore.
> 
> -Manish
>