[Ocfs2-tools-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Do not use ECC for fsck.ocfs2

[Goldwyn Rodrigues]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 07:45 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues<rgoldwyn at suse.de>
>> ---
>>  fsck.ocfs2/fsck.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fsck.ocfs2/fsck.c b/fsck.ocfs2/fsck.c
>> index e032dfd..ea072c6 100644
>> --- a/fsck.ocfs2/fsck.c
>> +++ b/fsck.ocfs2/fsck.c
>> @@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>        char *filename;
>>        int64_t blkno, blksize;
>>        o2fsck_state *ost =&_ost;
>> -       int c, open_flags = OCFS2_FLAG_RW |
>> OCFS2_FLAG_STRICT_COMPAT_CHECK;
>> +       int c, open_flags = OCFS2_FLAG_RW | OCFS2_FLAG_STRICT_COMPAT_CHECK
>> |
>> +               OCFS2_FLAG_NO_ECC_CHECKS;
>>        int sb_num = 0;
>>        int fsck_mask = FSCK_OK;
>>        int slot_recover_err = 0;
>
> So this patch series only fixes superblock. What about inodes and other
> metadata blocks. The good news is that we will recompute ecc for inodes
> that get fixed. But ones that have bad checksums, will not get fixed.
>

Yes, I am too busy right now (I am diversifying into other avenues). I
have put it in my TODO list and will get back to it once I have more
time (or urgently if the customer faces this problem ;))


-- 
Goldwyn