[Ocfs2-tools-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ocfs2-tools: correct inode number in prompt in check_link_counts

[Sunil Mushran]

Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran at oracle.com>

Marcos,
Please could you investigate as to why fswreck did not catch this issue.

Tiger Yang wrote:
> We don't get the correct ocfs2_dinode until ocfs2_read_inode(),
> so di->i_blkno is wrong at that line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang at oracle.com>
> ---
>  fsck.ocfs2/pass4.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fsck.ocfs2/pass4.c b/fsck.ocfs2/pass4.c
> index af33185..d713d13 100644
> --- a/fsck.ocfs2/pass4.c
> +++ b/fsck.ocfs2/pass4.c
> @@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ static void check_link_counts(o2fsck_state *ost,
>  	if (refs == 0 &&
>  	    prompt(ost, PY, PR_INODE_NOT_CONNECTED,
>  		   "Inode %"PRIu64" isn't referenced by any "
> -		   "directory entries.  Move it to lost+found?", 
> -		   (uint64_t)di->i_blkno)) {
> +		   "directory entries.  Move it to lost+found?", blkno)) {
>  		o2fsck_reconnect_file(ost, blkno);
>  		refs = o2fsck_icount_get(ost->ost_icount_refs, blkno);
>  	}
>