[Ocfs2-test-devel] Hello, any suggestion and update for ocfs2-test?

[Junxiao Bi]

On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi Junxiao,
> 
>>> 1. tell ocfs2-test a specified list of testcases to run
>>>
>>> This has been achieved by your patch introducing "-t" option. However,
>>> this option can only specify one case at a time, making the log of test
>>> results distributed among many directories. That's inconvenient to get a
>>> whole picture of the result at a glance;-)
>> OK, please fix the check part.
> 
> Done. I will send together with series v2;-)
> 
>>>
>>> 2. eliminating 2-layer loop for blocksize and clustersize by introducing
>>> "-b" (blocksize) and "-c" (clustersize) options so that we can loop
>>> different blocksize and clustersize outside of ocfs2-test
>> Looks good to test with specified block/cluster size, but I think it'd
>> better leave the original block/cluster coverage test there, it can be
>> made as a full test, it will be run if block/cluster is not given.
> 
> OK, totally agree with you, thanks.
> 
>>>
>>> This 2 patches [2][3] are for it.
>>>
>>> 3. different combinations of features and options for mkfs and mount
>>> operations, like
>>> "inline, sparse, unwritten, ...", and "journal={data | order|
>>> writeback}" etc
>>>
>>> I intend to untouch this for now. Maybe a global configuration file can
>>> be introduced to save different combinations for different test cases in
>>> the future. Thus, make it more configurable in a common file;-)
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-test-devel/2016-June/000849.html
>>> [2]
>>> https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-test-devel/2016-June/000850.html
>>> [3]
>>> https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-test-devel/2016-June/000851.html
>>>
>>> Could you help review those fixes? Thus, I can push the fixes with a
>>> "reviewed-by" to
>>> upstream, and improve/resend the others.
> 
> How about this?
Sorry, I don't understand online fsck.

Thanks,
Junxiao.
> 
>>>
>>> BTW, any update for ocfs2-test from your side? I'd be very appreciated
>>> to see them;-)
>> No new patches from my side, all have been pushed to upstream.
> 
> Thanks! I asked, to make sure no overlapping work between us. ^o^
> 
> Regards,
> Eric
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Junxiao.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eric
>>
>>
>