[Ocfs2-test-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Resize_test: Fix a bug of resize_test.sh

[Marcos E. Matsunaga]

Signed-off-by: Marcos Matsunaga <Marcos.Matsunaga at oracle.com>

Regards,

Marcos Eduardo Matsunaga

Oracle USA
Linux Engineering

“The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not
necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation.”


On 03/16/2010 03:10 AM, Tristan Ye wrote:
> Currently, resizing of an ocfs2 volume will align with clustersize,
> in that case, we will definitely failed at growing volume size to
> the partion size if partitionsize didn't align to clustersize:
>
> Instead, we'd better let tunefs.ocfs2 determine the largest size
> it could afford by specify size as NULL(means grow the size to end).
>
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com>
> ---
>  programs/resize_test/resize_test.sh |    7 +++++--
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/programs/resize_test/resize_test.sh b/programs/resize_test/resize_test.sh
> index bc483d1..7177d5f 100755
> --- a/programs/resize_test/resize_test.sh
> +++ b/programs/resize_test/resize_test.sh
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ normal_resize_test() {
>  		dbgout=${outdir}/${YMD}.dbg
>  
>  		blocks=$[${blocks}+${incblk}]
> -		if [ ${blocks} -gt ${partsz} ]
> +		if [ ${blocks} -ge ${partsz} ]
>  		then
>  			blocks=0
>  		fi
> @@ -306,6 +306,9 @@ do_backup_test() {
>  	fi
>  	
>  	do_mount
> +	if [ ${end} -ge ${partsz} ];then
> +		end=0
> +	fi
>  	do_tunefs ${tuneout} ${end}
>  	do_umount
>  	do_fsck ${fsckout}
> @@ -362,7 +365,7 @@ online_boundary_test() {
>  	echo "y"|${MKFS} -b ${blocksz} -C ${clustsz} -N 4 -L ${label} ${device} ${start} >/dev/null
>  
>  	do_mount
> -	do_tunefs ${tuneout} ${partsz}
> +	do_tunefs ${tuneout} 0
>  	do_umount
>  	do_fsck ${fsckout}
>  
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-test-devel/attachments/20100316/7ba5f8b1/attachment.html