[Ocfs2-test-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Ocfs2-test: Fix a silly bug of reflink_test.

[Tristan Ye]

The running script 'reflink_test_run.sh' is now using a wrong
option('-D') to do DIRECTIO test for reflink, actually it will
make the runner invoke another test, rather than the directio_test

That's totally a silly mistake from me which caused we skip all the
DIRECTIO testcases for single_node reflink_test, and make the reflink_test
wasn't able to capture odirect bugs like bz1226 for reflink.

Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com>
---
 programs/reflink_tests/reflink_test_run.sh |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/programs/reflink_tests/reflink_test_run.sh b/programs/reflink_tests/reflink_test_run.sh
index 69ce4d3..b2dec57 100755
--- a/programs/reflink_tests/reflink_test_run.sh
+++ b/programs/reflink_tests/reflink_test_run.sh
@@ -523,9 +523,9 @@ ${WORK_PLACE} -c 100 >>${LOG_FILE} 2>&1
 	((TEST_NO++))
         f_LogRunMsg ${RUN_LOG_FILE} "[${TEST_NO}] O_DIRECT Refcount Test:"
         f_LogMsg ${LOG_FILE} "[${TEST_NO}] O_DIRECT Refcount Test, CMD:${SUDO} \
-${REFLINK_TEST_BIN} -i 1 -n 100 -l 104857600 -d ${DEVICE} -w ${WORK_PLACE} -D "
+${REFLINK_TEST_BIN} -i 1 -n 100 -l 104857600 -d ${DEVICE} -w ${WORK_PLACE} -O "
         ${SUDO} ${REFLINK_TEST_BIN} -i 1 -n 100 -l 104857600 -d ${DEVICE} -w \
-${WORK_PLACE} -D >>${LOG_FILE} 2>&1
+${WORK_PLACE} -O >>${LOG_FILE} 2>&1
         RET=$?
         f_echo_status ${RET} | tee -a ${RUN_LOG_FILE}
         f_exit_or_not ${RET}
-- 
1.5.5