[Ocfs2-test-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Ocfs2-test: Add a testcase for inline-data&xattr combination test.

[Tiger Yang]

Tristan Ye wrote:
> It's a really interesting case, cmd 'dd bs=N count=1' and 'dd bs=1 count=N'
> let our ocfs2 inline-data codes behave differently when handling inline-data
> and inline-xattr, with such an additional testcase,our tests will be more likely
> to expose the potential bug of inline-data&inline-xattr.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com>
> ---
>  programs/xattr_tests/xattr-single-run.sh |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/programs/xattr_tests/xattr-single-run.sh b/programs/xattr_tests/xattr-single-run.sh
> index 0ab7df5..dc8e2f9 100755
> --- a/programs/xattr_tests/xattr-single-run.sh
> +++ b/programs/xattr_tests/xattr-single-run.sh
> @@ -478,6 +478,20 @@ f_combin_test()
>  	${SETXATTR} -n "user.small" -v "SMALL" ${TEST_FILE}
>  	exit_or_not $?
>  
> +	${DD_BIN} if=/dev/zero of=${TEST_FILE} bs=$((${MAX_INLINE_DATA}-${MAX_INLINE_XATTR}+1))  count=1 2>>${DETAIL_LOG_FILE} >/dev/null
> +
> +	sync
> +	${DEBUGFS_BIN} -R "stat ${DEBUG_TEST_FILE}" ${OCFS2_DEVICE}|grep -qi InlineData && {
> +		echo "Inline data should not invade a reserved inline-xattr space.">>${DETAIL_LOG_FILE}
> +		return 1
> +	}
> +
> +	${RM} -rf ${TEST_FILE}
> +	${TOUCH_BIN} ${TEST_FILE}
> +
> +	${SETXATTR} -n "user.small" -v "SMALL" ${TEST_FILE}
> +	exit_or_not $?
> +
>  	${SETXATTR} -x "user.small" ${TEST_FILE}
>  	exit_or_not $?
>  

Thanks, Tristan,

Signed-off-by: Tiger Yang <tiger.yang at oracle.com>