[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH V2] ocfs2: fix dead lock caused by ocfs2_defrag_extent

[Joseph Qi]

On 18/11/1 11:11, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Larry,
> 
> I still have a few tiny comments for your patch, please refer to them.
> 
> On 2018/11/1 5:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Folks, could we please review this patch for upstream inclusion?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> From: Larry Chen <lchen at suse.com>
>> Subject: ocfs2: fix deadlock caused by ocfs2_defrag_extent
>>
>> ocfs2_defrag_extent may fall into deadlock.
>>
>> ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents
>>    ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents
>>      ocfs2_move_extents
>>        ocfs2_defrag_extent
>>          ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents
>>
>>            ocfs2_reserve_clusters
>>              inode_lock GLOBAL_BITMAP_SYSTEM_INODE
>>
>> 	  __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log
>>              inode_lock GLOBAL_BITMAP_SYSTEM_INODE
>>
>> As backtrace shows above, ocfs2_reserve_clusters() will call inode_lock
>> against the global bitmap if local allocator has not sufficient cluters.
>> Once global bitmap could meet the demand, ocfs2_reserve_cluster will
>> return success with global bitmap locked.
>>
>> After ocfs2_reserve_cluster(), if truncate log is full,
>> __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log() will definitely fall into deadlock because it
>> needs to inode_lock global bitmap, which has already been locked.
>>
>> To fix this bug, we could remove from ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents()
>> the code which intends to lock global allocator, and put the removed code
>> after __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log().
>>
>> ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents() is refered by 2 places, one is here,
>> the other does not need the data allocator context, which means this patch
>> does not affect the caller so far.
>>
>> [lchen at suse.com: rename ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents() to ocfs2_lock_meta_allocator_move_extents(), add some comments]
>>    Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_20180902091455.23862-2D1-2Dlchen-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=K8aRgOiMescamJW-IuHq-cW4mWedGQv2JTT-2KPy1RI&s=3fQHFtwgixirPeQ5Px4fRBnd_UcSx3rvSsLKLidwESo&e=
>> Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_20180827080121.31145-2D1-2Dlchen-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=K8aRgOiMescamJW-IuHq-cW4mWedGQv2JTT-2KPy1RI&s=PQOJREyeElsg_1IlINdSGefNqA6w_cUrI1ezdVxyi7o&e=
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Chen <lchen at suse.com>
>> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark at fasheh.com>
>> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org>
>> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi at oracle.com>
>> Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903 at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
>> ---
>>
>>   fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c~fix-dead-lock-caused-by-ocfs2_defrag_extent
>> +++ a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ out:
>>    * in some cases, we don't need to reserve clusters, just let data_ac
>>    * be NULL.
>>    */
>> -static int ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents(struct inode *inode,
>> +static int ocfs2_lock_meta_allocator_move_extents(struct inode *inode,
>>   					struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et,
>>   					u32 clusters_to_move,
>>   					u32 extents_to_split,
> 
> After removing 'reserving clusters logic' out of this function, I suggest to also change the function header comments.
> And I think there is no need for arguments _data_ac_ now.
> Otherwise this patch looks sane to me.
> 
Agree, I think I have commented this out before.

Thanks,
Joseph

> Thanks,
> Changwei
> 
>> @@ -192,13 +192,6 @@ static int ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_ex
>>   		goto out;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (data_ac) {
>> -		ret = ocfs2_reserve_clusters(osb, clusters_to_move, data_ac);
>> -		if (ret) {
>> -			mlog_errno(ret);
>> -			goto out;
>> -		}
>> -	}
>>   
>>   	*credits += ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(osb->sb, et->et_root_el);
>>   
>> @@ -257,10 +250,11 @@ static int ocfs2_defrag_extent(struct oc
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	ret = ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents(inode, &context->et, *len, 1,
>> -						 &context->meta_ac,
>> -						 &context->data_ac,
>> -						 extra_blocks, &credits);
>> +	ret = ocfs2_lock_meta_allocator_move_extents(inode, &context->et,
>> +						*len, 1,
>> +						&context->meta_ac,
>> +						&context->data_ac,
>> +						extra_blocks, &credits);
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		mlog_errno(ret);
>>   		goto out;
>> @@ -283,6 +277,21 @@ static int ocfs2_defrag_extent(struct oc
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Make sure ocfs2_reserve_cluster is called after
>> +	 * __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log, otherwise, dead lock may happen.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * If ocfs2_reserve_cluster is called
>> +	 * before __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log, dead lock on global bitmap
>> +	 * may happen.
>> +	 *
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = ocfs2_reserve_clusters(osb, *len, &context->data_ac);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		mlog_errno(ret);
>> +		goto out_unlock_mutex;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
>>   		ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
>> @@ -600,9 +609,10 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extent(struct ocfs
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	ret = ocfs2_lock_allocators_move_extents(inode, &context->et, len, 1,
>> -						 &context->meta_ac,
>> -						 NULL, extra_blocks, &credits);
>> +	ret = ocfs2_lock_meta_allocator_move_extents(inode, &context->et,
>> +						len, 1,
>> +						&context->meta_ac,
>> +						NULL, extra_blocks, &credits);
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		mlog_errno(ret);
>>   		goto out;
>> _
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
>> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>