[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: clean dead code in suballoc.c
Joseph Qi
jiangqi903 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 19:24:37 PST 2017
On 17/12/13 11:04, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Stack variable fe is no longer used, so trim it to save some cpu cycles
> and stack space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei at h3c.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> index 71f22c8fbffd..a74108d22d47 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> @@ -2566,7 +2566,6 @@ static int _ocfs2_free_clusters(handle_t *handle,
> int status;
> u16 bg_start_bit;
> u64 bg_blkno;
> - struct ocfs2_dinode *fe;
>
> /* You can't ever have a contiguous set of clusters
> * bigger than a block group bitmap so we never have to worry
> @@ -2575,8 +2574,6 @@ static int _ocfs2_free_clusters(handle_t *handle,
> * gotten tested really well. */
> BUG_ON(start_blk != ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(bitmap_inode->i_sb,
> ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(bitmap_inode->i_sb, start_blk)));
>
Here is malformed. Suggest explicitly split the long line into two as
well.
Thanks,
Joseph
> - fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) bitmap_bh->b_data;
> -
> ocfs2_block_to_cluster_group(bitmap_inode, start_blk, &bg_blkno,
> &bg_start_bit);
>
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list