[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix improper handling of return errno

Gang He ghe at suse.com
Sun May 22 22:34:57 PDT 2016




>>> 
> On 2016/5/23 10:30, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Previously, if bad inode was found in ocfs2_iget(), -ESTALE was
>> returned back to the caller anyway. Since commit d2b9d71a2da7
>> ("ocfs2: check/fix inode block for online file check") can handle
>> with return value from ocfs2_read_locked_inode() now, we know the
>> exact errno returned for us.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren at suse.com>
> Looks good to me, thanks.
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gang He <ghe at suse.com>

> 
>> ---
>>  fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 7 +------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> index ba495be..fee5ec6 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> @@ -176,12 +176,7 @@ struct inode *ocfs2_iget(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 
> blkno, unsigned flags,
>>  	}
>>  	if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
>>  		iput(inode);
>> -		if ((flags & OCFS2_FI_FLAG_FILECHECK_CHK) ||
>> -		    (flags & OCFS2_FI_FLAG_FILECHECK_FIX))
>> -			/* Return OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_XXX related errno */
>> -			inode = ERR_PTR(rc);
>> -		else
>> -			inode = ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>> +		inode = ERR_PTR(rc);
>>  		goto bail;
>>  	}
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com 
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel




More information about the Ocfs2-devel mailing list