[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2_direct_IO_write misses ocfs2_is_overwrite error code
Joseph Qi
joseph.qi at huawei.com
Mon Sep 7 00:10:11 PDT 2015
On 2015/9/7 14:32, Norton.Zhu wrote:
> If ocfs2_is_overwrite failed, ocfs2_direct_IO_write may still return success to the caller.
> changelog:
> Using mlog_errno(ret) looks better than mlog_errno(is_overwrite)
>
> Signed-off-by: Norton.Zhu <norton.zhu at huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com>
> ---
> aops.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/aops.c b/aops.c
> index 0f5fd9d..01bbc56 100644
> --- a/aops.c
> +++ b/aops.c
> @@ -846,7 +846,8 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_direct_IO_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
>
> is_overwrite = ocfs2_is_overwrite(osb, inode, offset);
> if (is_overwrite < 0) {
> - mlog_errno(is_overwrite);
> + ret = is_overwrite;
> + mlog_errno(ret);
> ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
> goto clean_orphan;
> }
>
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list