[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/4] quota: Don't store flags for v2 quota format

[Jan Kara]

On Mon 19-01-15 01:14:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:13:10AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   Hum, I'm not sure I follow you. Current kernels will store any 32-bit
> > number user sets in flags field. So if we wanted to be 100% safe, we'd have
> > to just ignore that field. Which isn't currently a problem since quota code
> > doesn't use the field for anything (it was added just for future
> > extensions). But since I'm pretty certain noone actually relies on values
> > of that field, I though we could just get away with forcibly zeroing the
> > field now and if there's a need to use the field in a few years, we could
> > start using it.
> 
> Oh, I misread the code and your description.  I thought we would just
> store any potentially valid in-core flag on disk.
> 
> I guess for now the best case would be to stop storing anything, and
> then just make an educated decision if/when we need a flags field.
  Yes, that's what I do in the patch. So we are in agreement here.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR