[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/4 V2] ocfs2: use retval instead of status for checking error
Daeseok Youn
daeseok.youn at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 15:48:40 PST 2015
The use of 'status' in __ocfs2_add_entry() can return wrong
status when some functions are failed.
If ocfs2_journal_access_db() in __ocfs2_add_entry() is failed,
that status is saved to 'status' but return variable is 'retval'
which is saved 'success' status. In case of this, __ocfs2_add_entry()
is failed but can be returned as 'success'.
So replace 'status' with 'retval'.
Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn at gmail.com>
---
V2 : update changelog
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index b08050b..1478a50 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
struct ocfs2_dir_entry *de, *de1;
struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)parent_fe_bh->b_data;
struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
- int retval, status;
+ int retval;
unsigned int size = sb->s_blocksize;
struct buffer_head *insert_bh = lookup->dl_leaf_bh;
char *data_start = insert_bh->b_data;
@@ -1695,22 +1695,22 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
}
if (insert_bh == parent_fe_bh)
- status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
+ retval = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
INODE_CACHE(dir),
insert_bh,
OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
else {
- status = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
+ retval = ocfs2_journal_access_db(handle,
INODE_CACHE(dir),
insert_bh,
OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
if (ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir)) {
- status = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
+ retval = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
handle,
lookup);
- if (status) {
- mlog_errno(status);
+ if (retval) {
+ mlog_errno(retval);
goto bail;
}
}
--
1.7.1
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list