[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not put bh when buffer_uptodate failed
Joel Becker
jlbec at evilplan.org
Wed Mar 26 19:22:08 PDT 2014
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:05:58PM +0800, alex chen wrote:
> Do not put bh when buffer_uptodate failed in ocfs2_write_block and
> ocfs2_write_super_or_backup, because it will put bh in b_end_io.
> Otherwise it will hit a warning "VFS: brelse: Trying to free free
> buffer".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen at huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com>
Good catch. Can you tell me what testing or workload found this issue?
Just for future reference.
Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> index 5b704c6..1edcb14 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ int ocfs2_write_block(struct ocfs2_super *osb, struct buffer_head *bh,
> * information for this bh as it's not marked locally
> * uptodate. */
> ret = -EIO;
> - put_bh(bh);
> mlog_errno(ret);
> }
>
> @@ -420,7 +419,6 @@ int ocfs2_write_super_or_backup(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>
> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> ret = -EIO;
> - put_bh(bh);
> mlog_errno(ret);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.4.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #497
"Go down swinging."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec at evilplan.org
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list