[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: should not use le32_add_cpu to set ocfs2_dinode i_flags
Jeff Liu
jeff.liu at oracle.com
Wed May 29 03:17:06 PDT 2013
On 05/29/2013 04:12 PM, shencanquan wrote:
> On 2013/5/29 15:57, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> Thanks for your patch, Joseph.
>>
>> On 05/29/2013 10:42 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>
>>> If we use le32_add_cpu to set ocfs2_dinode i_flags, it may lead to the
>>> corresponding flag corrupted. So we should change it to bitwise and/or
>>> operation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi<joseph.qi at huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
>>> index 04ee1b5..3a5269a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
>>> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_mknod_locked(struct inode *dir,
>>>
>>> fe->i_last_eb_blk = 0;
>>> strcpy(fe->i_signature, OCFS2_INODE_SIGNATURE);
>>> - le32_add_cpu(&fe->i_flags, OCFS2_VALID_FL);
>>> + fe->i_flags |= cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_VALID_FL);
>>> fe->i_atime = fe->i_ctime = fe->i_mtime =
>>> cpu_to_le64(CURRENT_TIME.tv_sec);
>>> fe->i_mtime_nsec = fe->i_ctime_nsec = fe->i_atime_nsec =
>>> @@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ static int ocfs2_orphan_add(struct ocfs2_super
>>> *osb,
>>> goto leave;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - le32_add_cpu(&fe->i_flags, OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
>>> + fe->i_flags |= cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
>>> OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_flags&= ~OCFS2_INODE_SKIP_ORPHAN_DIR;
>>>
>>> /* Record which orphan dir our inode now resides
>>> @@ -2434,7 +2434,7 @@ int ocfs2_mv_orphaned_inode_to_new(struct inode
>>> *dir,
>>> }
>>>
>>> di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
>>> - le32_add_cpu(&di->i_flags, -OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
>>> + di->i_flags&= cpu_to_le32(~OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
>> Hmm? This is wrong. Instead it should be:
>> di->i_flags&= ~cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
>
> in ocfs2_remove_inode function , it has the following code:
> di->i_dtime = cpu_to_le64(CURRENT_TIME.tv_sec);
> di->i_flags &= cpu_to_le32(~(OCFS2_VALID_FL | OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL));
>
> I think at first clear the flag and then convert to the little end.
Call cpu_to_xxx(~value) or (~cpu_to_xxx(value)) will be evaluated end up
with the same result, but the later manner would looks a bit neater IMO.
Thanks,
-Jeff
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list