[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Rework transaction rollback in ocfs2_relink_block_group()

[Jeff Liu]

On 06/20/2013 01:13 PM, Younger Liu wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> There may be a mistake in the patch. See my comments below.
> 
> On 2013/6/19 23:02, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com>
>>
>> In ocfs2_relink_block_group(), we roll back all those changes if
>> notify intent to modify buffers for metadata update failed even
>> if the relevant buffer has not yet been modified/got dirty at that
>> point, that are not quite right because of:
>>
>> - None buffer has been modified/dirty if failed to call
>>   ocfs2_journal_access_gd() against the previous block group buffer
>> - Only the previous block group buffer has got dirty if failed to
>>   call ocfs2_journal_access_gd() against the block group buffer
>> - There is no need to roll back the change for file entry buffer at all
>>
>> Those problems will not cause anything wrong but unnecessary.
>> This patch fix them and kill the useless bg_ptr variable as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c |   25 ++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
>> index b7e74b5..101d16d 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
>> @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle,
>>  	int status;
>>  	/* there is a really tiny chance the journal calls could fail,
>>  	 * but we wouldn't want inconsistent blocks in *any* case. */
>> -	u64 fe_ptr, bg_ptr, prev_bg_ptr;
> 
> Why remove bg_ptr and prev_bg_ptr from the context?
> bg_ptr and prev_bg_ptr are also usable.

Strange! I'm not sure why that happened.  Actually, it looks like blow on my box.
-	u64 fe_ptr, bg_ptr, prev_bg_ptr;
+	u64 bg_ptr, prev_bg_ptr;

Anyway I'll resend it a little while.

Thanks,
-Jeff

> 
>>  	struct ocfs2_group_desc *prev_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *) prev_bg_bh->b_data;
>> @@ -1437,7 +1437,6 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle,
>>  		(unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_blkno),
>>  		(unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(prev_bg->bg_blkno));
>>  
>> -	fe_ptr = le64_to_cpu(fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno);
>>  	bg_ptr = le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_next_group);
>>  	prev_bg_ptr = le64_to_cpu(prev_bg->bg_next_group);
>>  
>> @@ -1446,7 +1445,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle,
>>  					 OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>  	if (status < 0) {
>>  		mlog_errno(status);
>> -		goto out_rollback;
>> +		goto out;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	prev_bg->bg_next_group = bg->bg_next_group;
>> @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle,
>>  					 bg_bh, OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>  	if (status < 0) {
>>  		mlog_errno(status);
>> -		goto out_rollback;
>> +		goto out_rollback_prev_bg;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	bg->bg_next_group = fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno;
>> @@ -1466,21 +1465,21 @@ static int ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle_t *handle,
>>  					 fe_bh, OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>  	if (status < 0) {
>>  		mlog_errno(status);
>> -		goto out_rollback;
>> +		goto out_rollback_bg;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno = bg->bg_blkno;
>>  	ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, fe_bh);
>>  
>> -out_rollback:
>> -	if (status < 0) {
>> -		fe->id2.i_chain.cl_recs[chain].c_blkno = cpu_to_le64(fe_ptr);
>> -		bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(bg_ptr);
>> -		prev_bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(prev_bg_ptr);
>> -	}
>> +out:
>> +	return status;
>>  
>> -	if (status)
>> -		mlog_errno(status);
>> +out_rollback_bg:
>> +	bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(bg_ptr);
>> +out_rollback_prev_bg:
>> +	prev_bg->bg_next_group = cpu_to_le64(prev_bg_ptr);
>> +
>> +	mlog_errno(status);
>>  	return status;
>>  }
>>  
>>
>