[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH V3] ocfs2: need rollback when journal_access failed in ocfs2_orphan_add()

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:50:59 +0800 Younger Liu <younger.liu at huawei.com> wrote:

> While adding a file into orphan dir in ocfs2_orphan_add(),
> it calls __ocfs2_add_entry() before ocfs2_journal_access_di(). 
> If ocfs2_journal_access_di() failed, the file is added into 
> orphan dir, and orphan dir dinode updated, but file dinode 
> has not been updated.
> Accordingly, the data is not consistent between file dinode 
> and orphan dir.
> 
> So, need to call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before __ocfs2_add_entry(),
> and if ocfs2_journal_access_di() failed, orphan_fe and 
> orphan_dir_inode->i_nlink need rollback. 
> 
> This bug is introduced by commits 3939fda4.
> 
> Compared with the PATCH V2, this patch cleans up mlog_errno(status) 
> which was called two times for the same error.
> 

Folks, could we please get this one reviewed?

From: Younger Liu <younger.liu at huawei.com>
Subject: ocfs2: need rollback when journal_access failed in ocfs2_orphan_add()

While adding a file into orphan dir in ocfs2_orphan_add(), it calls
__ocfs2_add_entry() before ocfs2_journal_access_di().  If
ocfs2_journal_access_di() failed, the file is added into orphan dir, and
orphan dir dinode updated, but file dinode has not been updated. 
Accordingly, the data is not consistent between file dinode and orphan
dir.

So, need to call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before __ocfs2_add_entry(), and
if ocfs2_journal_access_di() failed, orphan_fe and
orphan_dir_inode->i_nlink need rollback.

This bug was added by 3939fda4 ("Ocfs2: Journaling i_flags and
i_orphaned_slot when adding inode to orphan dir.").

Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu at huawei.com>
Cc: Jie Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran at gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh at suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/ocfs2/namei.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/ocfs2/namei.c~ocfs2-need-rollback-when-journal_access-failed-in-ocfs2_orphan_add fs/ocfs2/namei.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c~ocfs2-need-rollback-when-journal_access-failed-in-ocfs2_orphan_add
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
@@ -2012,6 +2012,21 @@ static int ocfs2_orphan_add(struct ocfs2
 		goto leave;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * We're going to journal the change of i_flags and i_orphaned_slot.
+	 * It's safe anyway, though some callers may duplicate the journaling.
+	 * Journaling within the func just make the logic look more
+	 * straightforward.
+	 */
+	status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
+					 INODE_CACHE(inode),
+					 fe_bh,
+					 OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
+	if (status < 0) {
+		mlog_errno(status);
+		goto leave;
+	}
+
 	/* we're a cluster, and nlink can change on disk from
 	 * underneath us... */
 	orphan_fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) orphan_dir_bh->b_data;
@@ -2026,22 +2041,7 @@ static int ocfs2_orphan_add(struct ocfs2
 				   orphan_dir_bh, lookup);
 	if (status < 0) {
 		mlog_errno(status);
-		goto leave;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We're going to journal the change of i_flags and i_orphaned_slot.
-	 * It's safe anyway, though some callers may duplicate the journaling.
-	 * Journaling within the func just make the logic look more
-	 * straightforward.
-	 */
-	status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle,
-					 INODE_CACHE(inode),
-					 fe_bh,
-					 OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
-	if (status < 0) {
-		mlog_errno(status);
-		goto leave;
+		goto rollback;
 	}
 
 	fe->i_flags |= cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL);
@@ -2057,11 +2057,16 @@ static int ocfs2_orphan_add(struct ocfs2
 	trace_ocfs2_orphan_add_end((unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
 				   osb->slot_num);
 
+rollback:
+	if (status < 0) {
+		if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
+			ocfs2_add_links_count(orphan_fe, -1);
+		set_nlink(orphan_dir_inode, ocfs2_read_links_count(orphan_fe));
+	}
+
 leave:
 	brelse(orphan_dir_bh);
 
-	if (status)
-		mlog_errno(status);
 	return status;
 }
 
_