[Ocfs2-devel] why oracle give up dlm by disk on ocfs2? because performance?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:07:52AM +0800, Jensen wrote:
> On 2013/7/2 9:35, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> 
> > A general purpose file system requires one to manage over a million locks concurrently. So performance is the main reason.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> Has Oracle compared the performance between ocfs2 and ocfs1?

Firstly, that's implied in the answer you just got. Also, who wouldn't
compare performance from one version of a file system to the next?

Can you please cut to the chase and either ask what you really want to know
or make the statement you're trying to make so we can move on?

Thanks,
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh