[Ocfs2-devel] why oracle give up dlm by disk on ocfs2? because performance?

Jensen shencanquan at huawei.com
Mon Jul 1 18:22:22 PDT 2013


Hi Mark, sunil, jeff an Joel,
   Do you know why ? Thanks.

Jensen.
2013-7-2

On 2013/6/29 11:27, Jensen wrote:

> Hi all,
>    I found ocfs1.0 use the Distributed lock manager by disk. on ocfs2 why give up? because performance or other reason?
> 
>    Btw:
>      on the ocfs1.0 why not use scsi-2/3 reservation to protect to update the dlm sector data?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jensen.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
> 
> 






More information about the Ocfs2-devel mailing list