[Ocfs2-devel] why oracle give up dlm by disk on ocfs2? because performance?
Jensen
shencanquan at huawei.com
Mon Jul 1 18:22:22 PDT 2013
Hi Mark, sunil, jeff an Joel,
Do you know why ? Thanks.
Jensen.
2013-7-2
On 2013/6/29 11:27, Jensen wrote:
> Hi all,
> I found ocfs1.0 use the Distributed lock manager by disk. on ocfs2 why give up? because performance or other reason?
>
> Btw:
> on the ocfs1.0 why not use scsi-2/3 reservation to protect to update the dlm sector data?
>
> Thanks,
> Jensen.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>
>
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list