[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: ensure journalaccess/journaldirty pairs don't cross journal restarting --ocfs2_rotate_subtree_left
Xiaowei.hu
xiaowei.hu at oracle.com
Wed Jan 11 23:32:16 PST 2012
How about this patch? Could anyone comment on it?
On 11/04/2011 11:59 AM, Wengang Wang wrote:
> journalaccess/journaldirty pairs shouldn't cross journal restarting.
> Function ocfs2_rotate_subtree_left() violates this rule. This patch tries
> to fix it.
>
> 1) adding a extra journal access before modifying the tree root. (see
> comment in patch it's self)
>
> 2) moving ocfs2_remove_empty_extent(left_leaf_el) priror, so that
> ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, path_leaf_bh(left_path)) can take care of it.
> (before the change, seems there is a miss of not putting left_leaf_el to
> journal in del_right_subtree case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang<wen.gang.wang at oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index ed553c6..ace7aa2 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -2708,20 +2708,8 @@ static int ocfs2_rotate_subtree_left(handle_t *handle,
> }
>
> if (eb->h_next_leaf_blk == 0ULL&&
> - le16_to_cpu(right_leaf_el->l_next_free_rec) == 1) {
> - /*
> - * We have to update i_last_eb_blk during the meta
> - * data delete.
> - */
> - ret = ocfs2_et_root_journal_access(handle, et,
> - OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> - if (ret) {
> - mlog_errno(ret);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> + le16_to_cpu(right_leaf_el->l_next_free_rec) == 1)
> del_right_subtree = 1;
> - }
>
> /*
> * Getting here with an empty extent in the right path implies
> @@ -2762,7 +2750,10 @@ static int ocfs2_rotate_subtree_left(handle_t *handle,
> ocfs2_rotate_leaf(left_leaf_el,&right_leaf_el->l_recs[0]);
> memset(&right_leaf_el->l_recs[0], 0,
> sizeof(struct ocfs2_extent_rec));
> + } else {
> + ocfs2_remove_empty_extent(left_leaf_el);
> }
> +
> if (eb->h_next_leaf_blk == 0ULL) {
> /*
> * Move recs over to get rid of empty extent, decrease
> @@ -2786,17 +2777,20 @@ static int ocfs2_rotate_subtree_left(handle_t *handle,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *)path_leaf_bh(left_path)->b_data;
> - ocfs2_et_set_last_eb_blk(et, le64_to_cpu(eb->h_blkno));
> -
> /*
> - * Removal of the extent in the left leaf was skipped
> - * above so we could delete the right path
> - * 1st.
> + * journal can just restarted in ocfs2_update_edge_lengths.
> + * we have to re-access the tree root. We still has an credit
> + * reserved for the tree root.
> */
> - if (right_has_empty)
> - ocfs2_remove_empty_extent(left_leaf_el);
> + ret = ocfs2_et_root_journal_access(handle, et,
> + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> + if (ret) {
> + mlog_errno(ret);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> + eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *)path_leaf_bh(left_path)->b_data;
> + ocfs2_et_set_last_eb_blk(et, le64_to_cpu(eb->h_blkno));
> ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, et_root_bh);
>
> *deleted = 1;
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list