[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: delay migration when the lockres is in migration state
Joel Becker
jlbec at evilplan.org
Tue Aug 14 23:42:15 PDT 2012
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:06:37AM +0800, Xue jiufei wrote:
> We trigger a bug in __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast() when we parallel umount 4 nodes. The situation is as follows:
> 1) Node A migrate all lockres it owned(eg. lockres A) to other nodes say node B when it umounts.
> 2) Receiving MIG_LOCKRES message from A, Node B masters the lockres A with DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING state set.
> 3) Then we umount ocfs2 on node B. It also should migrate lockres A to another node, say node C. But now, DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING state
> of lockers A is not cleared. Node B triggered the BUG on lockres with state DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuejiufei <xuejiufei at huawei.com>
This patch is now part of the fixes branch of ocfs2.git.
Joel
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
> index 005261c..6c35406 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
> @@ -2357,6 +2357,10 @@ static int dlm_is_lockres_migrateable(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>
> assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock);
>
> + /* delay migration when the lockres is in MIGRATING state */
> + if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (res->owner != dlm->node_num)
> return 0;
>
> -- 1.7.9.7
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #139
"Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec at evilplan.org
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list