[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: make direntry invalid when deleting it

Tao Ma tm at tao.ma
Tue Jul 12 19:04:41 PDT 2011


Hi wengang,
On 07/12/2011 04:43 PM, Wengang Wang wrote:
> When we deleting a direntry from a directory, if it's the first in a block we
> invalid it by setting inode to 0; otherwise, we merge the deleted one to the
> prior and contiguous direntry. And we don't truncate directories.
> 
> There is a problem for the later case since inode is not set to 0.
> This problem happens when the caller passes a file position as parameter to
> ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk(). If the position happens to point to a stale(not
> the first, deleted in betweens of ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk()s) direntry, we are
> not able to recognize its staleness. So that we treat it as a live one wrongly.
looks fine to me.
But do you have any test cases that expose this bug or is it just
inspired by code review?

Thnaks
Tao
> 
> The fix is to set inode to 0 in both cases indicating the direntry is stale.
> This won't introduce additional IOs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 8582e3f..3302088 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -1184,8 +1184,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_delete_entry(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
>  			if (pde)
>  				le16_add_cpu(&pde->rec_len,
>  						le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len));
> -			else
> -				de->inode = 0;
> +			de->inode = 0;
>  			dir->i_version++;
>  			ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, bh);
>  			goto bail;




More information about the Ocfs2-devel mailing list