[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 02/22] ocfs2: Add an incompat feature flag OCFS2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CLUSTERINFO
Sunil Mushran
sunil.mushran at oracle.com
Sat Oct 9 04:41:27 PDT 2010
Any other changes wrt disk format. Kurt's team is testing this thing. And I would like to make the changes in one go to minimize the pain.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker at oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:26:48PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 04:11 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
>>>> /*00*/ __u8 ci_stack[OCFS2_STACK_LABEL_LEN];
>>>> - __le32 ci_reserved;
>>>> + union {
>>>> + __le32 ci_reserved;
>>>> + struct {
>>>> + __u8 ci_reserved1;
>>>> + __u8 ci_reserved2;
>>>> + __u8 ci_reserved3;
>>>> + __u8 ci_stackflags;
>>>>
>>> Just curious, why stick ci_stackflags at the bottom of this structure?
>>>
>>> Wouldn't putting it at the top allow us to grow the field in the future...
>>>
>>> Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>
>> Grow stackflags? Hmm... did not think of that.
>>
>> I don't have a good reason for putting it at the end. Well,
>> when I put it, I thought I did. Not anymore.
>
> Do it. I don't know that we'll ever grow it, but having the
> field at the beginning reads better too.
>
> Joel
>
> --
>
> "Always give your best, never get discouraged, never be petty; always
> remember, others may hate you. Those who hate you don't win unless
> you hate them. And then you destroy yourself."
> - Richard M. Nixon
>
> Joel Becker
> Consulting Software Developer
> Oracle
> E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
> Phone: (650) 506-8127
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list