[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered v3
Li Dongyang
lidongyang at novell.com
Mon May 3 19:10:26 PDT 2010
On Tuesday 04 May 2010 09:47:23 Joel Becker wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:37:48AM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 May 2010 04:52:43 Joel Becker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:47:05PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> > > > Have you tested this version? I got a compile error:
> > >
> > > I want to be clear - has this patch (v3) been run against the
> > > fsstress that caused the bug report in the first place? Does the
> > > fsstress now pass? Let me know so I can send it upstream.
> > >
> > > Joel
> >
> > it's a typo I made on my desktop, I first test it on my 2-node boxes, and
> > it had already running fsstress for at least 70hrs(50 hrs with the
> > OCFS2_INODE_SKIP_ORPHAN_DIR patches),
> > then I checked out the ocfs2/master branch on my desktop in case of the
> > differences between ocfs2/master and linus tree(like the block check in
> > ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks). and made changes, then generated the patch,
> > and a typo is made here, what a silly mistake!
>
> And you are sure that the changes made by-hand on your desktop
> are the same as made on your 2-node machines?
>
> Joel
>
I just got a diff on my 2-node boxes, and checked it char to char, the only
difference is the v3 patch lack the comma you pointed.
Br,
Li Dongyang
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list