[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Reoganize data elements to reduce memory footprint
Joel Becker
Joel.Becker at oracle.com
Wed Jun 9 17:54:49 PDT 2010
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:45:10PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> > index c67003b..34b9c79 100644
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> > @@ -151,17 +151,16 @@ struct ocfs2_lock_res {
> > void *l_priv;
> > struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops *l_ops;
> > spinlock_t l_lock;
> > + enum ocfs2_lock_type l_type;
On the subject of extreme structure diets... ocfs2_lock_res
uses ints for l_ro_holders and l_ex_holders. Do we ever have more than
64K holders? Can we squash those into u16s? I note that our code
doesn't handle overflow at all, but 2^32 holders is significantly
larger.
Goldwyn, did you test this with CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_STATS and
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ENABLED turned on or off? I'd be interested in that
data too.
Joel
--
"But all my words come back to me
In shades of mediocrity.
Like emptiness in harmony
I need someone to comfort me."
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list