[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Ocfs2: Treat ocfs2 truncate as a special case of punching holes v1.
tristan
tristan.ye at oracle.com
Sun Jan 24 18:32:19 PST 2010
Wow, thanks for such quick review:)
Tao Ma wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
> Thanks for the work.
> Some comments inlined.
>
> Tristan Ye wrote:
>> As we known, truncate is just a special case of punching holes(from
>> new i_size
>> to end), we therefore could take advantage of existing
>> ocfs2_remove_extent() codes
>> to reduce the comlexity and redundancy in alloc.c, the goal here is
>> to make truncate
>> codes more generic and straightforward.
>>
>> Several former functions only used by ocfs2_commit_truncate() will be
>> simply wiped off.
>> New logic for truncating will remove extents from truncate_size to
>> file end one by one,
>> just like punching holes did.
>>
>> v1 patch didn't include the codes for refcount supporting in truncate
>> and holes punching,
>> it will be added in next series.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 630
>> ++++--------------------------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 590 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
>> index 38a42f5..8598452 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> <snip>
>> @@ -7409,198 +6986,73 @@ int ocfs2_commit_truncate(struct ocfs2_super
>> *osb,
>> struct buffer_head *fe_bh,
>> struct ocfs2_truncate_context *tc)
>> {
>> - int status, i, credits, tl_sem = 0;
>> - u32 clusters_to_del, new_highest_cpos, range;
>> - u64 blkno = 0;
>> - struct ocfs2_extent_list *el;
>> - handle_t *handle = NULL;
>> - struct inode *tl_inode = osb->osb_tl_inode;
>> - struct ocfs2_path *path = NULL;
>> + int status, i;
>> + u32 trunc_start, trunc_end, trunc_len, cpos, phys_cpos, alloc_size;
>> struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)fe_bh->b_data;
>> - struct ocfs2_alloc_context *meta_ac = NULL;
>> - struct ocfs2_refcount_tree *ref_tree = NULL;
>> + struct ocfs2_extent_tree et;
>> + struct buffer_head *eb_bh;
>> + struct ocfs2_extent_block *last_eb;
>> + struct ocfs2_extent_list *el;
>>
>> mlog_entry_void();
>>
>> - new_highest_cpos = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(osb->sb,
>> - i_size_read(inode));
>> -
>> - path = ocfs2_new_path(fe_bh, &di->id2.i_list,
>> - ocfs2_journal_access_di);
>> - if (!path) {
>> - status = -ENOMEM;
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> -
>> - ocfs2_extent_map_trunc(inode, new_highest_cpos);
>> + ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), fe_bh);
>>
>> -start:
>> - /*
>> - * Check that we still have allocation to delete.
>> - */
>> - if (OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_clusters == 0) {
>> - status = 0;
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> -
>> - credits = 0;
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Truncate always works against the rightmost tree branch.
>> - */
>> - status = ocfs2_find_path(INODE_CACHE(inode), path, UINT_MAX);
>> - if (status) {
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> -
>> - mlog(0, "inode->ip_clusters = %u, tree_depth = %u\n",
>> - OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_clusters, path->p_tree_depth);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * By now, el will point to the extent list on the bottom most
>> - * portion of this tree. Only the tail record is considered in
>> - * each pass.
>> - *
>> - * We handle the following cases, in order:
>> - * - empty extent: delete the remaining branch
>> - * - remove the entire record
>> - * - remove a partial record
>> - * - no record needs to be removed (truncate has completed)
>> - */
>> - el = path_leaf_el(path);
>> - if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
>> - ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
>> - "Inode %llu has empty extent block at %llu\n",
>> - (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
>> - (unsigned long long)path_leaf_bh(path)->b_blocknr);
>> - status = -EROFS;
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> + trunc_start = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(osb->sb,
>> i_size_read(inode));
>> + if (le64_to_cpu(di->i_last_eb_blk)) {
>> + eb_bh = tc->tc_last_eb_bh;
>> + last_eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *)eb_bh->b_data;
>> + el = &last_eb->h_list;
> why not just check tc->tc_last_eb_bh? It is more readable. Say you
> check tc_last_eb_bh and then it has value, set el to it. btw, do we
> really need eb_bh? Minor issue.
Yes, you're right, check if tc_last_eb_bh is NULL making more sense than
i_last_eb_blk.
>> + } else
>> + el = &di->id2.i_list;
>>
>> i = le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) - 1;
>> - range = le32_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_cpos) +
>> - ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, &el->l_recs[i]);
>> - if (i == 0 && ocfs2_is_empty_extent(&el->l_recs[i])) {
>> - clusters_to_del = 0;
>> - } else if (le32_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_cpos) >= new_highest_cpos) {
>> - clusters_to_del = ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, &el->l_recs[i]);
>> - blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno);
>> - } else if (range > new_highest_cpos) {
>> - clusters_to_del = (ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, &el->l_recs[i]) +
>> - le32_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_cpos)) -
>> - new_highest_cpos;
>> - blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno) +
>> - ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(inode->i_sb,
>> - ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, &el->l_recs[i]) -
>> - clusters_to_del);
>> - } else {
>> - status = 0;
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>>
>> - mlog(0, "clusters_to_del = %u in this pass, tail blk=%llu\n",
>> - clusters_to_del, (unsigned long
>> long)path_leaf_bh(path)->b_blocknr);
>> + trunc_end = le32_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_cpos) +
>> + ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, &el->l_recs[i]);
>>
>> - if (el->l_recs[i].e_flags & OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED &&
>> clusters_to_del) {
>> - BUG_ON(!(OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features &
>> - OCFS2_HAS_REFCOUNT_FL));
>> + if (trunc_end >= trunc_start)
>> + trunc_len = trunc_end - trunc_start;
>> + else
>> + trunc_len = 0;
>>
>> - status = ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree(osb,
>> - le64_to_cpu(di->i_refcount_loc),
>> - 1, &ref_tree, NULL);
>> - if (status) {
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> + cpos = trunc_start;
>> + while (trunc_len) {
>>
>> - status = ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del(inode, fe_bh,
>> - blkno,
>> - clusters_to_del,
>> - &credits,
>> - &meta_ac);
>> - if (status < 0) {
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> + if (OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_clusters == 0) {
>> + status = 0;
>> goto bail;
>> }
>> - }
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&tl_inode->i_mutex);
>> - tl_sem = 1;
>> - /* ocfs2_truncate_log_needs_flush guarantees us at least one
>> - * record is free for use. If there isn't any, we flush to get
>> - * an empty truncate log. */
>> - if (ocfs2_truncate_log_needs_flush(osb)) {
>> - status = __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log(osb);
>> - if (status < 0) {
>> + status = ocfs2_get_clusters(inode, cpos, &phys_cpos,
>> + &alloc_size, NULL);
>> + if (status) {
>> mlog_errno(status);
>> goto bail;
>> }
>> - }
>>
>> - credits += ocfs2_calc_tree_trunc_credits(osb->sb, clusters_to_del,
>> - (struct ocfs2_dinode *)fe_bh->b_data,
>> - el);
>> - handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
>> - if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
>> - status = PTR_ERR(handle);
>> - handle = NULL;
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> + if (alloc_size > trunc_len)
>> + alloc_size = trunc_len;
>>
>> - status = ocfs2_do_truncate(osb, clusters_to_del, inode, fe_bh,
>> handle,
>> - tc, path, meta_ac);
>> - if (status < 0) {
>> - mlog_errno(status);
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> -
>> - mutex_unlock(&tl_inode->i_mutex);
>> - tl_sem = 0;
>> -
>> - ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>> - handle = NULL;
>> -
>> - ocfs2_reinit_path(path, 1);
>> -
>> - if (meta_ac) {
>> - ocfs2_free_alloc_context(meta_ac);
>> - meta_ac = NULL;
>> - }
>> + if (phys_cpos != 0) {
>> + status = ocfs2_remove_btree_range(inode, &et, cpos,
>> + phys_cpos, alloc_size,
>> + &tc->tc_dealloc);
>> + if (status) {
>> + mlog_errno(status);
>> + goto bail;
>> + }
>> + }
> I would really appreciate it if we can start from the end to the
> beginning. You know, if we start from cpos, when we remove an extent,
> the b-tree codes will try to rotate_tree_left. So if there are many
> extents for us to truncate, the performance will decrease a lot. While
> in the old implementation, we remove extents from the tail, so no
> b-tree rotation at all.
Wow, it's a significant improvement! great catch, tao.
I just copied idea from punching holes code, it also starts from begin
to end, as what you said, maybe we can also do the same improvement for
existing punching holes code, to remove the extents from end to begin.
how do you think about it?
Regards,
Tristan.
>
> Regards,
> Tao
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list