[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix __ocfs2_cluster_lock() dead lock
Wengang Wang
wen.gang.wang at oracle.com
Sat Jan 9 10:05:22 PST 2010
On 10-01-06 18:00, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:34:44PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > there is deadlock possibility in __ocfs2_cluster_lock().
> > the case is like following.
> >
> > #in time order
> > 1) node A(the lock owner) is doing an up-convert(UC, PR->EX). it got the lock
> > but didn't check BUSY flag again.
> >
> > 2) node B requested an UC on the same lock resource. since node A has an EX on
> > the lockres, a bast is issued and OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag is set to the lockres
> > meanting that a DC is should be done. the DC asks for agreement of node A to
> > release EX. and for now node A refuses that(still in process of getting that
> > lock:) ).
> >
> > 3) the UC on node A runs into the phrase of checking OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag and
> > if it can continue without waiting for any DC. code is:
> >
> > if (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED &&
> > !ocfs2_may_continue_on_blocked_lock(lockres, level)) {
> >
> > analysis:
> > the BLOCKED flag is set in 2), and the UC can't continue to get the lock(
> > ocfs2_may_continue_on_blocked_lock() returns false), so it the DC to finish.
> >
> > so both UC and DC are waiting for each other --a dead lock.
>
> 1) Do you have a test case? Have you seen this happen, or are you just
> postulating from reading the code?
> 2) It sure looks like you're right.
well, this doesn't sounds like a sob :)
regards,
wengang.
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list