[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Ocfs2: Handle deletion of refcounted oprhan_inode correctly.
tristan
tristan.ye at oracle.com
Sun Feb 21 00:58:14 PST 2010
Tao Ma wrote:
> Hi tristan,
>
> Tristan Ye wrote:
>> Current ocfs2 semantic for reflinking a file firstly create a
>> new orphan_inode in orphan_dir, then remove it to target dir
>> after refcounting operation done, these 2 steps makes logic
>> straightfoward, and guarantee a crash during reflinking can
>> be replayed(half-refcounted inode can be removed), while it
>> brings us another issue cause these 2 steps is acquiring the
>> orphan_dir lock respectively, the problem is, orphan_scan()
>> may detect the half-refcounted inode in orphan_dir as its
>> proper candidates to wipe off in a later time. actually it's
>> not of course, we'd handle this correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye <tristan.ye at oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> index 88459bd..61fb546 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
>> @@ -892,14 +892,30 @@ static int ocfs2_query_inode_wipe(struct inode
>> *inode,
>> di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) di_bh->b_data;
>> if (!(di->i_flags & cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL))) {
>> /* for lack of a better error? */
>> - status = -EEXIST;
>> - mlog(ML_ERROR,
>> - "Inode %llu (on-disk %llu) not orphaned! "
>> - "Disk flags 0x%x, inode flags 0x%x\n",
>> - (unsigned long long)oi->ip_blkno,
>> - (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(di->i_blkno),
>> - le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags), oi->ip_flags);
>> - goto bail;
>> + if (!(di->i_dyn_features &
>> + cpu_to_le16(OCFS2_HAS_REFCOUNT_FL))) {
>> + status = -EEXIST;
>> + mlog(ML_ERROR,
>> + "Inode %llu (on-disk %llu) not orphaned! "
>> + "Disk flags 0x%x, inode flags 0x%x\n",
>> + (unsigned long long)oi->ip_blkno,
>> + (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(di->i_blkno),
>> + le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags), oi->ip_flags);
>> + goto bail;
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * It did happen to us, though it's a rare case:
>> + * orphan_scan() detects the half-refcounted inode
>> + * in orphan_dir, and delete_inode() attempts to
>> + * wipe it after reflink operation done later. now
>> + * we're not allowed to delete such a valid inode,
>> + * instead, just bail out.
>> + */
>> + mlog(0, "Skipping delete of %llu because it's a "
>> + "reflinked inode\n",
>> + (unsigned long long)oi->ip_blkno);
>> + goto bail;
>> + }
> We set i_dyn_features when when attach the tree to the file. This is
> very early. So I am curious why i_dyn_features can tell you whether
> this isn't a crashed reflink inode? Oh, you mean you will never delete
> a reflinked inode in orphan scan?
Tao,
Not exactly, if it's reflink operation was crashed somehow, it's
OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL must be set:), and if it was the case, we then will
never skip the deletion which is really needed.
Regards,
Tristan.
>
> Regards,
> Tao
More information about the Ocfs2-devel
mailing list